I heard a song on the radio this morning that so completely expressed
everything I've been feeling for the last many weeks. Don't recall ever
having heard it before, yet it resonated familiarity to the degree one
feels when hearing a holiday carol one has not heard since childhood...
And now, the only phrase I remember from the lyrics is "...I'm feeling,
Though there is more to this, I must hold the thought to attend
other duties so that I may, with a clear conscience, fulfill other plans I
have on my list today. In the interim, the questions I shall be pondering
in the background of my routine:
"How do we know if/when we have removed the log from our own
(invisible/spiritual/intellectual mind's) eye?"
"If/when we are confident in the answer we discover to this above question
to a degree sufficient to conclude that we are thus enabled, what (if
anything) are we responsible and accountable to do (and not do) in the
realm of thusly empowering others?"
"How is such enabling empowerment righteously achieved...???"
PS: One significant mark of 'true love' is that we want only for the
happiness of the other person, no matter whether their happiness involves
us, or not.
PPS: Following are a couple of links to Bible verses that I personally see
as conveying some semblance of ineffable humility, integrity and truth and
I don't mean by sharing the following to in any way be 'preaching' -- just
simply offering you a window into the way I think:
Walk in faith....
THE ULTIMATE SOLUTION...
GUEST EDITORIAL: From the pen of the Arlberg Ozarkie
My circle of acquaintances in these Ozarks includes quite a handful of
would-be reformers: socio-eco-religio-politico activists, if not by deed
certainly by word. I respectfully decline to be an active part of that.
Not that I don't agree with many of the positions they take or the points
they make, because I certainly do. But I know futility when I see it,
and...maybe I'm just lazy.
We are incensed with the way things are handled by the ruling class. The
wealthy oppress the poor. The powerful oppress the weak. The religious
leaders confound and entrap the sheep with a hellfilled, threatening
dogma. We are incensed.
Something must be done about this. We must take action. We must rant and
rave until our very guts are raw with ulcers.
Natural resources are being exploited. Pollution is defiling the air we
breath and the water we drink. Hundreds of television channels and nothing
fit to watch. Lies. We're being fed nothing but lies and half-truths. We
are incensed, and WE MUST DO SOMETHING TO TURN THIS ALL AROUND, TO MAKE
THIS WORLD A BETTER PLACE FOR US.
So do it. But first, answer these questions:
(1) Who are "WE"? Who are we that are the correct ones, the ones who are
more right and righteous than the others?
(2) If WE form an organization to effect the changes that we know are
needed in this world, how do we not fall into the organizational trap: the
need for leaders (ruling class--the powerful oppress the weak); rules to
tell us how to do it (stage prop for corruption); financial means with
which to carry out the plan (wealthy oppress the poor); all for one, one
for all (half-truths and lies); the plan itself (hellfilled threatening
WE can't do it.
You and I can do it. You and I can make a personal commitment to live at
peace with each other and with our environment. You and I can make a
personal commitment to honesty and integrity. You and I can do it. WE
Note to another friend...
I gave up guilt when I adopted karma as a guiding principle in
my life. It has become clear to me over the years that what goes around
does indeed come around. Our chickens do come home to roost and whatever
crumbs we cast upon the waters shall absolutely return to haunt or bless
us an hundred fold. Thus I contemplate the quality and purpose of my
And I agree with you 100% -- "A true disrupter can't ever disrupt
intelligence." You've pretty much said it all right there. No contest. I'm
a true believe in the cause: "If they will not adopt a plan of action to
deal with evil they are evil as well and just another part of the
problem." Also the thing from the book about 'New ideas were treated as
guilty until proven innocent...' I have dealt with this throughout the
entirety of my 'adult' life and it is wearying. But then you know this
from experience, too.
I also agree that the 'close minded and self convinced' are -- in your
terms -- the enemy. Yet I find this term a too-convenient 'catch all'
label which enables us ('the good guys') to objectify the problem and thus
(falsely) address our actions to the 'symptoms' rather than (correctly) to
a realistic 'cure'.
And even here, I agree with your approach... or at least that your
approach -- to ridicule and humiliate the enemy -- is a powerful and
essentially proactive one. It's just that I really must stretch to grasp
what the 'good & beneficial' outcome is that is to ultimately come from
actions of this ilk.
And I guess in a way I think of it all in the same vein as I do about
raising children... only really, the true objective of any ('good') parent
is NOT to raise 'children,' but to raise adults... to nurture and
cultivate 'individuals' who are capable to think about life and decide
important issues for themselves...
And with kids, it is easy to humiliate, shame, guilt and ridicule them
into submission... but the long-range effect of this is to break their
spirit and engender to them attitudes (by immersing them in behaviors)
which are contrary to the self-stated goal of raising intellectually and
emotionally healthy human beings.
Under this heading, it seems to me that all these folks who are so
dumbfoundingly 'stupid' are really (at base line) intellectually
dysfunctional because they are emotionally immature. I believe this is
because they have been raised in a cultural environment which is immersed
in a social paradigm that predominantly indoctrinates us with the belief
that (#1) 'we are all sinners,' (#2) 'all sinners must be punished,' and
(#3) the 'best' way to punish someone is by ridicule and humiliation....
Thus the cycle of debilitation trudges on....
PS: As always, nice to hear your dulcet tones on the phone and much
appreciate the wisdom of all the words you wrote.
Following the thread...
We all do, of course, have all the answers to all of our own questions all
of the time, (aka: the kingdom is indeed 'at hand'). Still sometimes it is
like looking for a jar of mustard that you know you have but just can't
seem to locate at the moment.
One question I ponder from time to time is what, exactly, is love.
See, I affirm that I love everyone... and legitimately, I believe I do.
Even folks who piss me off by what seems to me to be unconscionable
behavior, I just wanna be free of them... be someplace they are not... and
still, I wish them well... hoping that they (or I as the case may be) 'see
the light' and get on with doing whatever is ours to do in the world.
Beyond that, I believe that 'being loving' (to and with those I choose to
associate with) is a choice that I can turn on or turn off quite
purposefully as a matter of decision... Although when things are 'going
well' among friends this 'decision' is a foregone conclusion and it is
generally only when things are NOT 'going well' that we discover whether
(or not) we have the personal mettle to abide this choice.
Yet there is something beyond the simple act of 'caring' about the well
being of others; there is this ethereal realm where 'love' and 'romance'
and 'physical attraction' seem to get all intermixed in a medley of
emotions that are somehow autonomic (genetic? spiritual? reflexitive?
reptillian? -- I dunno) and are thus outside the scope of any type of
contemplative force or decision-making action...
A kind of special quality that just 'is' -- an extra added measure of
(irrational) 'vibrational resonance' that is provoked by another's
presence and/or thoughts about them in their absence that is somehow
tingly, disarming and anticipatory, glowing with admiration and (whether
deserved or not) buoyant with trust. And this is what I would define as
'being in love.'
Related to this, another thing niggling my brain subsequent to a recent
conversation with a friend has to do with spouses (aka: life-mates, soul
mates, etc.) having friends of either gender... I've always (sorta kinda)
had friends that were both men and women, however my spouses always seemed
to frown on me having friendships with guys, which I've always understood
as the 'male insecurity/jealousy' thing and I would find it awfully
difficult to tolerate these kinds of 'unspoken' restrictions anymore.
At the same time though, when a couple has several young children there is
generally such a limited amount of time to actually enjoy your spouse's
company that it does beg the question as to just how much time either
party can afford to invest in cultivating any type of meaningful
friendship with anyone of either gender (other than their spouse) without
somehow taking time away from their spouse and thus NOT giving the
(supposed) primary relationship/partner the quality of life they
(supposedly) hooked up with the other person 'to have and to hold' -- ie:
Anyway, as a friend closed an email recently... Catch the wave.
Chicken Little vs.
New Year's note to a friend:
It is good to connect with someone who actually knows what it
is like to 'live' and 'do' with the bliss of appreciation.
I get weary sometimes of being called a Pollyanna... though I have come to
take it as a compliment, still it bothers me that the connotations it
carries convey a sense of unreliability and 'pie in the sky' and (as you
so aptly put it) "Yeah right. Woman's full of crap." -- which, to my way
of looking at myself is not at all who I see myself to be... and in terms
of 'real world' accomplishments would certainly seem to be contrary to the
So there comes with this a sense of 'not being known' (as a person) for
'who I really am'... and also of having to 'defend' myself against other
people's 'imaginings' by putting up some sort of contrived pretense to
allay 'their' (fearful and errant) preconceptions and misgivings about me
which are (factually) grounded only in their own bigoted distortion of
'reality'... All of which truly sucks, makes it exceedingly difficult if
not totally impossible to develop any tangible/mutual 'depth' to a
friendship and is simply a game I will not play.
Not that I never have played it... But just that I won't anymore. And this
is a recurring New Year's resolution of mine, which I seem to get better
at (by exploring new dimensions of) every year. Every day, in fact, and
with every breath for that matter. Anyway...
Yes, life immersed in the light at the end of the tunnel is a good place
to be... and it is also all too true that most people's lives are "way
over half full" of "Chicken Little" crap... and that they adamantly
believe with the purest conviction that they have absolutely no choice but
to 'suffer through' everything just that way... and are (for the most
part, though covertly) rather 'proud' of themselves for adopting this
downtrodden 'reactive' (reptilian) behavior as their own...
In the immortal words of Fiddler on the Roof: "Tradition..."
Are you familiar with the story of this musical...??? There is much wisdom
therein. Truly an inspired work... Speaking of which, how is your own
Also, I would say that you got 'un-lobotomized' -- but then we've already
established that I am a Pollyanna and thus my words, thoughts and deeds
are irrational and to be readily dismissed. That aside, the frontal lobes
are (scientifically speaking) the 'seat of consciousness' (aka:
Whilst surfing around I came upon this reference:
"In the widely read Da Vinci Code, author Dan Brown relates how each of
us is affected by something called scotoma, defined as a blind or dark
spot in our visual field. Brown introduces this term to explain how we may
look at something everyday without glimpsing an apparent truth, an ah-ha!
within immediate reach, though our former associations blind us to
alternate meanings and transparent keys to truth and wisdom."
This 'scotoma' stuff is extraordinarily interesting in context of our
"Chicken Little / Pollyanna" conversation. In fact (imho) our own
(individual) ability to purposefully utilize this (God given) 'cognitive
filter' -- adjusting its 'reticular' capacities to 'match' our
preferred/enjoyed/desire (imagined) 'version' of reality is THE
(scientific/intellectual) KEY to being 'un-lobotomized.'
Following this cognitive thread, understand that the 'energy of
consciousness' (aka: the electro-chemical impulses that flow through the
brain as 'thoughts') is controlled by the 'reticular filters' (the
physical seat of which is in a part of the brain called the amygdala) to
either (a) cycle through the frontal lobes, generating increases in
creativity, happiness, and gratitude or (b) shunt back to the 'reptilian
core' of the brain (at the top of the spinal cord) stimulating actions
that are win/lose 'survival' fear-driven and reactionary.
"Only those who are un-lobotomized get to taste the blessings of perfect
peace, everlasting happiness, blissful abundance and eternal life." ~The
Great Gozarkian One(s)
If elements of the foregoing conversation
interest you, I highly recommend the following books.
Order here through Amazon and we at Gozarks (aka: my kids and me)
actually earn a few cents...!!!! Thanks!!!
Science of Life
|Usually ships in
|Chaos, Creativity, and
|by Rupert Sheldrake
|Avg customer review:
|Usually ships in 24 hours
Experiments That Could Change the World: A Do-It-Yourself Guide
to Revolutionary Science (2nd Edition with Update
|Usually ships in
|Looking for more books to enrich the mind with musings about
history, science, government and life?
ArmchairHoodlum Book Shop.
Christine Weiss [read
Hey! Come visit us at
GOZARKS FORUM IS
BACK!!! -- CLICK HERE
Thanks & Much Appreciation to Our Website Development & Internet Marketing
Clients, most especially for their toleration of our sometimes
extraordinary and routinely unique editorial point of view... with which
they may not always agree and yet, being true to the spirit of mutual
respect, honor our differences amicably.
Drug Policy Education
like your 'puter is under attack by the virus-mongers, viral Trojans
and data- sucking worms?